Winter Classic Moves to Wrigley

7 Jul

After a highly successful New Year’s Day matchup in Buffalo last season, the NHL has decided to replay the Winter Classic on Jan. 1 at Wrigley Field in Chicago (TSN).

The Chicago Blackhawks and the Stanley Cup Champion Detroit Red Wings will play in a makeshift arena just like the one seen at Ralph Wilson Stadium last season when Pittsburgh and Buffalo played.

Wrigley Field

Wrigley Field

Reportedly, Chicago and Wrigley Field beat out Yankee Stadium and New York for the second installment of the Winter Classic. Yankee Stadium is in it’s final season of existence, and my guess is that Wrigley Field was chosen because Yankee Stadium is already getting the benefits of this years’ MLB All-Star Game.

I find it odd, though, that Wrigley Field was the ultimate choice.

Chicago and Detroit will be a great game to showcase. Detroit is coming off a Stanley Cup run, and will most likely be the favorite to repeat in ’08-’09. Chicago will look to build upon a surprising season where it finished with 88 pts., the highest total since 96 pts. in 2001-2002.

The only question that can be posed is, why Wrigley?

There is a much bigger venue in town that would surely be filled to capacity should the game be played there. That venue is Soldier Field.

Soldier Field seats approximately 61,500 fans (Ballparks.com). This is more than 20,000 more than Wrigley, which seats only 41,118 (Ballparks.com). More seats means more revenue. It also means a better atmosphere.

Soldier Field

Soldier Field

The atmosphere plays such a huge part in these outdoor games because the Winter Classic might be the number one tool to lure fans back to watching hockey.

Last year’s game was everything the NHL could have asked for and then some. A record crowd of 71,217 witnessed the face of the ‘new’ NHL win it in the last shot of a shootout…money in the bank.

The momentum created from that game needs to be sustained this year.

Wrigley Field is one of the most famous parks in the country, and it has history and lure. However, a football field is fashioned better for a hockey rink. The long sidelines and symmetrical square/oval shape means good viewing for the fans at the game, and a better background setting for the TV audience.

My fear is that it will look like I’m watching the Emerald Bowl in San Francisco’s AT&T Park. The setting is terrible, and the way the cameras are positioned shows the outfield fence where there were seemingly no fans.

If the game were played at Soldier Field, it would feature several tiers of fans completely surrounding the spectacle that is the Winter Classic. Also, it would allow for more Red Wing fans to attend the game. If you remember the game in Buffalo, then you probably remember there being quite a few Pens fans in attendance, and there cheers were definitely heard when Sidney Crosby netted the winning goal.

The drive is only about four or five hours between the cities, an easy trip.

Nevertheless, the game will be another sight to see. Surely NBC and the NHL will do everything possible to make this game as outstanding as it predecessor. It might actually be pretty cool to watch the players come out of the the same dugout as Andre Dawson and Ryne Sandberg.

The best the NHL can ask for is that both teams come in playing like they did last year, and we know how hard that can be to predict, especially with the Blackhawks.

Bear in mind that the announcement has not officially been made, so all of this could change. But it appears that the announcement will be made this week that Wrigley Field will be the venue.

About these ads

9 Responses to “Winter Classic Moves to Wrigley”

  1. Anthony July 7, 2008 at 12:42 pm #

    So, this is pretty interesting. Ty Conklin might see his 3rd outdoor game now with the Wings. Is there any more word, that you know of, on a just Pennsylvania outdoor game between Philthy and the Pens at Beaver Stadium?

  2. christophergates July 7, 2008 at 1:07 pm #

    I’ve heard lots of talk about the Pens and Flyers playing at Beaver Stadium, but from what I’ve heard Penn State is the problem. I’ve heard that the University has issue with the game being played there. What those issues are, I’m not sure.

    What at atmosphere that would be though. Imagine over 100,000 fans watching a hockey game!

  3. Dan July 7, 2008 at 4:11 pm #

    I’ve heard similar reports, but I recieved word from a good source that Penn State has preliminarily approved to have such an event at Beaver Stadium. But my guess is this approval took too long for Beaver Stadium to be a potential venue for the WC II. Now that Yankee Stadium will be out of the picture, I imagine Beaver Stadium could be the site on New Years Day 2010.

  4. christophergates July 7, 2008 at 4:21 pm #

    I found more info about it, which is a bit dated but nevertheless warranted.

    http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2008/01/25/could_beav_host_nhl_game.aspx

    From the link above:
    “It’s an interesting idea, but we haven’t been contacted,” Penn State athletic director Tim Curley said. “I know Michigan State hosted one and had a positive experience, so certainly it might be a nice event, but I just don’t know enough of the details. We would have to cross that bridge when we get there.”

    He later is quoted saying:
    “I know when the Sabres game was played, our students aren’t in town that day. There’s a lot of background information that I’d need to get before we can make any evaluation on whether we would be interested or not,” Curley said. “The particulars, the financial arrangement, the date, the requirements needed, the television arrangements, all those things when you host a large event. We would need to learn more of the details about how those might be set up.”

    So it sounds as if the Athletic Department at PSU is interested, but need a little motivation to get the ball rolling. Wanna contribute? Join the facebook group:

    http://psu.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7921013222

  5. hierophant4582 July 10, 2008 at 6:09 pm #

    Hey man. I added you to the old blogroll. Cool site.

  6. devonblake77 July 22, 2008 at 11:40 pm #

    Pittsburgh will not be in another outdoor game for a while. I can’t imagine why you’d place the same team twice in a close proximity of time. It would be unfair to all the other teams that haven’t played one yet. I’d imagine a Vancouver versus Calgary, or Minnesota versus Dallas would be the next likely match. I’m not a fan of having this thing every year though. It’s becoming like the AllStar Game. Eventually it will look the same every year.

  7. christophergates July 23, 2008 at 12:44 am #

    I agree it should only be played every once in a while. However, early rumors (and that’s all they are) say that the new Yankee Stadium is the likely destination for next year’s game. Likely Rangers vs. Islanders.

    Penguins vs. Flyers would just be a great idea because it is a neutral site that would sell out…and I mean sell out. It would be such a spectacle to see over 100,000 fans at an NHL game.

  8. rubberbandman July 24, 2008 at 3:27 pm #

    Would it sell out? I’m not so positive of that but I guess its debatable. I could see this thing becoming like the NFL and Thanksgiving games. Whether that is a good idea or not I haven’t decided. Frankly I’m a little tired of watching the Lions suck it up every year while I eat turkey…

  9. createmo November 2, 2008 at 10:25 am #

    Thank you for your site ;-)
    I made with photoshop backgrounds for myspace or youtube and whatever
    my backgrounds:http://tinyurl.com/6r7cav
    take care and thank you again!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: